For the beleaguered Congress Party, there seems to be very
little good news. Their leader Rahul Gandhi has failed to capture the imagination
of the general public. Their ploy to woo the ‘secular’ Muslim vote was not
meted with much enthusiasm. Their current PM is an unmitigated disaster and one
who has not only lowered himself but lowered the PMO by his fecklessness. Their
leaders such as P Chidambaram are not contesting elections and there are rumors
to suggest that those who are contesting are doing so with the utmost
reluctance. Finally, their chief rival Narendra Modi whom they have spent years
demonizing in various ways is going strong and has strong support among the
people and social media.
Rahul Gandhi started out being the ‘next big thing’ and
continued to remain that for quite some time. But whenever he appears for an
interview such as his talk with Arnab or merely delivers a speech, he cannot
help but cause considerable embarrassment for himself and his party. There may
be moments when his speeches are well written but his perpetually befuddled demeanor,
his uncanny ability to interrupt his own sentences, and his general tone of uncertainty
makes it sound like a schoolboy who dozing on the backbench when he was asked
to read a text from a chapter but is not quite sure of the what the text is and
if sounds that he is producing is actually correct. But such is the party
structure, that despite several better speakers, it is this bungling prince that
has to be the face of the party. Thus he goes places and speaks, his face is
plastered all over the place but secretly many are laughing. They say the jokes
about any leader tell you what the people are thinking about. In Rahul’s case, the jokes are usually about him being either childish or slow-witted. I almost
suspect that Rahul Gandhi himself is not entirely desirous of what he is being
forced to do but realizes that he has no option.
With their leader in bad shape, the congress and the people
around them realize that in all this disarray even modestly good news, becomes
cause for celebration and this modestly good news came to the form of Priyanka
Gandhi. She started by launching an attack on the BJP and then on its PM
candidate Narendra Modi. Among her attacks included claims that the BJP was
behaving like 'panicky rats', she also said that India needed a leader with a
large heart, not a 56-inch chest, she defended her husband and played victim
for ‘relentless attacks’ and finally, she compared her brother to Rajiv Gandhi
who she asserted was a great visionary and who laid his life for the unity of
the country. Interestingly there were
not attacks on AAP either because it isn’t a factor anymore or is something
cooking between the two of them?
Another interesting point to note is how various Congress
people are trying to portray her as a re-incarnation of Indira Gandhi, who is
here to set things correct. Pictures have been circulated that have her in
direct comparison with Indira Gandhi in her countenance. But the truth is
Indira Gandhi was a factor perhaps 30 years ago and that comparison may
resonate with die-hard supporters but nothing much beyond that.
The ravenous media
who is waiting for the next ‘big story’ lapped it up with great eagerness. They
covered her speeches, her handshakes with common folks, her handshakes with AAP
works, her patting people on the shoulders and on the back. They showed her
being able to interact with the common folk. It is undeniable that she is
relaxed on stage and has an easy delivery that is peppered with humor and a
constant smile on her face and she is light years ahead of her brother (who isn’t
the brightest bulb on the planet) with it comes to her communications skills.
So should she be taken seriously? If you are a good speaker,
launching a brutal attack on your opponent is the easiest thing to do, but we
take them seriously only when the person speaking is of some credibility or achievement.
Let’s take a quick look at the background of Priyanka Gandhi:
·
There are strong allegations that her husband
Robert Vadra is involved in many shady dealings.
·
She has never contested elections
·
She has never held any official position in the
Congress Party
·
She had has been involved in campaigns but
nothing more than that
All this
probably makes her nothing more than a Sanjay Jha. Good on attack, low on
credibility and fact. She would have
coasted through stronger had her brother done a good job in developing the
place but one look at the situation in the Gandhi stronghold Amethi will dispel
all notions of development. There is no proper infrastructure or basic necessities
such as proper electricity or clean drinking water have been ignored as well.
During the campaign in 1999, Priyanka spoke to the BBC in which she said: "I am very clear in my mind. Politics is not a strong pull, the people are. And I can do things for them without being in politics". She went on to add "I have said it a thousand times; I am not interested in joining politics..."
But in politics there are no absolute truths, she can easily
claim that she is in a place where she desires to be in active politics. But to
gain any credibility, she will have to formally join the party, formally run
for elections, involve herself with people at the grass-root level, and achieve
something that is beyond her famous surname. The advent of social media has dispelled the
myth of the ‘first family’ aura, the only way to win people’s hearts is doing some
solid good work which is infinitely more difficult than giving speeches.
Will Priyanka Gandhi do so or will she be content being the flavor of the month? Time will tell.
Comments
Post a Comment