Recently, the principles of freedom of expression, and science were put to test, predictably, 'liberals' demonstrated scant comprehension or concern for these fundamental tenets of modern civilization.
The political ideology that we variously call
liberalism, leftism, or progressivism has degenerated into an anti-science cult
that is impervious to feedback.
In the spotlight illuminating this
cultism were Spotify, Substack, and a trucker protest in Canada.
It began with singer Neil Young giving Spotify an ultimatum
that they could either have podcaster Joe Rogan or him on their platform. (Spotify is
the world's largest audio streamer with over 172
million paying subscribers.) Young claimed Rogan’s podcast was
“spreading fake information about vaccines – potentially causing death to those
who believe the disinformation.” Rogan had recently interviewed an infectious
disease specialist who opposes Covid-19 vaccines for children.
Spotify removed Young’s music with "regret" and
hopes that he would return soon. Reports suggest that Spotify has lost
anywhere between
$2 and $4 billion dollars in market value after the controversy.
Consequently, Rogan apologized while Spotify pledged to add
a "content advisory" to any episode with a discussion of Covid. Also, Young
received the publicity he probably yearned for, as the crusader of vaccines.
Next Spotify will be pressurized to fire Rogan, owing to an exodus
of musical talent for business reasons. Perhaps for ‘offensive’ utterances in
Rogan’s earlier podcasts will be discovered that morally justifies his firing.
Now for Substack, an online platform with over 1 million
paying subscribers that allows writers to send digital
newsletters to subscribers. The platform received criticism from the left for
the lack of ‘regulation’.
The
Washington Post led the charge by lambasting Substack for
“making millions off anti-vaccine content”. The Post claimed that Substack “can
make like-minded people more radicalized in their beliefs. A popular newsletter
can be picked up and amplified by other outlets, as well as forwarded to others.”
How ironic that The Post, which made millions by relentlessly
peddling misinformation about President Trump has the audacity to blame others
for spreading misinformation. But the self-righteous seldom have any
self-awareness.
Substack responded by pledging
to defend free expression, even for the content they disliked or disagreed
with. We can expect infrastructure challenges for Substack very soon; perhaps like
Parler, they
will be denied servers.
In Canada, a massive
convoy of truckers staged a protest against PM Trudeau's
vaccine mandate for truckers crossing the US-Canada border.
Trudeau reacted by fleeing from his home like a petrified
mouse scampering into his burrow. Then like a deposed dictator,
Trudeau relayed a message from an undisclosed location calling the protest
an attack on democracy.
In the coming weeks, expect the might of the government to be
applied to destroy the lives of the protestors. Trudeau and the Canadian media
have already created the ground for severe punishment.
In current times, all mainstream groups in the Western World
obediently follow groupthink. This
includes the mainstream news media, showbiz, the intelligentsia, the political
establishments, international bodies, big tech, non-profit
organizations, and even comedians.
Their political leanings, the causes they advocate, their likes and dislikes are identical, which also makes their hypocrisies identical.
This is totalitarianism which is the hallmark of a cult.
Those who lived under a totalitarian government will tell you what
the regime fears most is contrarian ideas. Rebels can be severely punished and
made examples of.
But great ideas, contrary to groupthink, are impossible to restrain
or censor. A powerful idea can be spread by word of mouth to captures the public’s imagination.
It could lead to a mass movement causing an overthrow of the regime.
Hence when the totalitarian cult notices a worthy contrarian
challenge, their instincts are to denigrate both the individual and the
platform. This is why President Trump was de-platformed; he represented a challenge that they cannot
counter.
The cult may claim to be progressive, but in reality, they
fear progress and growth because it challenges their monopoly. Their
self-righteousness enables them to rationalize the application of anti-democratic
measures such as censorship and de-platforming.
This merits a revision of the principles of freedom of
expression.
It is an axiomatic fact that mental growth occurs only when the
mind is exposed to a diverse spectrum of ideas. For this to happen there has to
be total freedom of expression.
This freedom includes the right to criticize, offend and
insult.
What is hateful to one is compelling to another. What is
bigoted to one is brave to another. What is obscene to one is artful to
another. What is crass to one may be hilarious to another. A bigot to one is a
maverick to another. A liberal to one is a fascist to another. The alt-right to
one is a rationalist to another.
Individual taste must not be the criteria for
restricting or allowing expression.
Dr. Fauci, recently claimed those who criticize him are "criticizing science because he represents science." He sounded like a despot leader of a third-world country who treats criticisms of himself as treasonous disparagements of the state.
But science is the antithesis of a cult. Scientists regularly
seek peer review of their theories and inventions. If
the scientist can counter all shortcomings raised during reviews, the theory or invention is
approved.
These reviews occur at various stages, even after approval, if
noteworthy deficiencies are discovered. The manufacturers often withdraw
products should customers discover significant shortcomings.
Why should the rules for the Covid-19 vaccine be different?
The vaccine proponents have been inconsistent in their claims.
They first claimed that those who are fully vaccinated are
protected from infection of Covid-19. When the vaccinated were infected, they
claimed vaccinated individuals won’t suffer during their infection. When the
vaccinated people suffered during their infection, they claimed the vaccinated
will certainly survive their infection. When some vaccinated individuals died,
they claim that deaths were rare or due to pre-existing conditions. They also
keep redefining the term 'fully-vaccinated' by adding boosters. Some who have
taken the vaccine have suffered serious side effects.
This understandably caused a great deal of skepticism.
Also, this isn’t a disposable product you can throw away; it is material
being injected into your body; the changes are likely to be permanent. Hence people
have a right to be concerned and reject the vaccine.
The censoring of contrary views, the shutting down of
questions, demonizing of skeptics and mandating vaccines results in the
fortification of skepticism, which quickly devolves into dogma.
Instead, the proponents should invite skeptics for a long
interaction with the developers of the vaccine. If necessary there should be demonstrations
of the effectiveness of the vaccine.
Since they claim to be certain of the virtues of the vaccine, they shouldn't hesitate to make a full presentation to dispel all
skepticism. This would be the best way to promote the vaccine and ensure that
everybody takes it.
In the end, as Fauci claims, this is about science. Science is about openness.
For the success of the vaccine, the proponents of the vaccine must follow the principles of science and democracy.
Let every question be answered and doubt cleared.
Will that ever happen?
Don't hold your breath!
This also appears on American Thinker
Comments
Post a Comment