Elon Musk's recent $43 billion offer to buy Twitter caused headlines all over the world.
So how did liberals react?
The meltdown began with Twitter employees throwing tantrums
like school kids, it continued through the week with MSNBC warning
viewers about Musk’s Twitter take over will have 'massive, life and
globe-altering consequences'. The carried through the weekend with SNL resorting
to racism claiming that Musk was making the offer so he could loosen its free
speech rules because “That's how badly White guys want to use the N-word,"
s
The question remains why are liberals almost mortally afraid
of unrestricted freedoms of expression.
Why does the thought of President Trump returning to Twitter
cause liberals to throw into a conniption?
Do they not know that being subjected to opposing ideas is fundamental
and essential to growth.
In Science, the invitation of critics is an essential step in verifying the effectiveness of inventions and the validity of
theories.
When you write an article or a book or make a film, you always get it
reviewed by another to ensure that it sounds exactly the way it does when the
idea was in your head. Quite often you may have failed to express yourself well
well. Without criticism, you will never know
this.
In product development, testing is a crucial phase of getting
it right. When a tester within the team has completed his testing,
they invite potential end-users to provide a fresh perspective. Quite often
upon working on the same product for ages, we take things for granted but an
outsider tells you something fresh.
There is an old proverb in India that says “May your worst constructive critic be your neighbor” because the neighbor will always cause you to improve
and alert you about a peril with opposing ideas.
If you plan to quit your job and join a rock band, this neighbor
may remind you that you could never sing or play a musical instrument.
Hence they recommend that experiment with rock music over the
weekend or opt for a leave of absence instead of quitting your job. They remind
you it is tough finding a new job owing to the economy.
When your experiment as a rock musician is a failure because despite
your passion you lack the talent, you return back to your daytime job feeling
good that “at least I tried”
If you had silenced all critics, you would have been
unemployed and eventually struggling.
Why is it that liberals are against these opposing points of
view, despite knowing that it is indispensable?
They also frequently characterize their opposition as brain
dead, bigoted, backward, and MAGA cap village bumpkins. They also claim that
morality lies solely with them and that the majority agrees with them.
Why then do they not allow total freedom of expression, so they
can be comprehensively decimated their opponents in a debate and immediately render
them irrelevant
Most people look forward to entering competitions where
victory is guaranteed.
What is driving this seemingly irrational fear?
The reason obviously is that their ideas and not only deeply
deficient and very obscure but also extremely dangerous.
Despite what they claim, their goal is not to improve lives but instead to ensure domination and monopoly which leads to power and personal
enrichment.
From BLM to Climate Change to Covid-19 lockdowns to
transgenderism they demand total surrender or enforcement of mandates.
Their motto is “Support us or do it our way or you are a
<pejorative epithet>?”
They also fear that their tribe of brainwashed drones may be
swayed and exposed if exposed to new ideas.
The chain is as strong as its weakest link, if Twitter falls, the rest will be irrelevant.
Hence control of social media is essential.
They will therefore do their very best to stop Musk’s take
over. Musk may not even be a change agent, but the symbolism of him taking over
simply cannot be allowed because he challenges the monopoly.
This is identical to the feeling of revulsion in Washington
whenever President Trump’s name is mentioned.
Trump caused peace, prosperity, and stability, if Washington
really care about regular people, they would have supported him. But no, by
entering Washington via the very top, Trump had challenged their monopoly. They
placed impediments all through his tenure and rigged the 2020 elections in
myriad ways i.e. Zuckerbucks infiltrating sacrosanct election
introduction, allowing mail-in ballots, and the relentless baseless
media propaganda.
They have a puppet installed in his place.
For daring to challenge their monopoly, Musk could be subjected to identical treatment as Trump.
Perhaps he will be investigated, and baseless allegations of racism, sexism,
homophobia, etc. may be brought on. Their propaganda wing i.e. the mainstream
media are eager participants.
Much like they did with Trump, they want to make an example of
Musk as a warning signal to other investors “Don’t even think about it or there
will be hell”.
If Musk actually manages a takeover, the challenges will begin. Corporate management, and the various other regulating
bodies within and beyond Twitter will place myriad impediments before Musk to either block or retard the speed of changes. The struggle will be much like Trump's relentless brawls to survive in
saboteur-ridden Washington.
The only joy, that some may derive is watching liberals react as they lose control of their bastion.
Also appears on American Thinker
Comments
Post a Comment