The day before yesterday, Paul Pelosi, the husband of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, was attacked at the couple’s home in San Francisco by a male assailant
Law
enforcement sources, that remained unnamed, obviously,
told CNN that the assailant was searching for the speaker of the House. The
source claims the intruder confronted the speaker’s husband in their San
Francisco home shouting, “Where is Nancy? Where is Nancy?”
This was apparently the exact call that January 6th ‘rioters’
made as they ‘hunted’ House Speaker and broke into her office.
How did Paul manage to alert the police?
According to another unnamed CNN source, Paul called 911 himself after telling the intruder he had to go
use the bathroom. Yes, the violent intruder was considerate enough to allow
Paul to take a bathroom break.
This is very rare, but let’s give Paul the benefit of doubt. Perhaps
Paul is one of those rare lucky individuals that arouses compassion even in a psychopathic
assailant.
The man who assaulted Paul Pelosi tried to tie him up “until Nancy
got home,” according to two CNN sources familiar with the situation, once again
these two sources were unnamed.
When
officers arrived on the scene, police said they
saw both Paul Pelosi and his assailant with their hands on a hammer. At that
moment, the assailant allegedly pulled the hammer from Pelosi and struck him.
Drew Hammill, a spokesman for Nancy Pelosi, released a statement that Paul was
taken to a hospital where underwent a “successful surgery to repair a skull
fracture and serious injuries to his right arm and hands” and ‘his doctors
expect a full recovery’.
It is very rare that a man attacked with a hammer causing a skull
fracture to make a full recovery. It is also very rare for doctors to be able
to make such a declaration without observing the patient for a prolonged
period.
But let’s give Paul the benefit of doubt, again, perhaps he is one
of those rare lucky individuals.
There are a few open questions about the attack.
Doesn’t Nancy Pelosi’s residence, have security, she is third in
line for the Presidency after all.
https://twitter.com/pnjaban/status/1586031119647928320
The motive behind the attack is unclear.
San Francisco Police Chief William Scott said during a news
conference on the investigation that authorities are still determining a motive
behind the attack, but they intend to book the suspect on felony charges.
“The suspect is still in the hospital, but let me say this: we
intend to book the suspect, whether it’s in absentia or whether it’s in person
– he will be booked for felony charges,”
But that didn't stop the Democrats and their media
messengers from baselessly claiming that the attack
was politically
motivated and blaming whom else but Republicans and President
Donald Trump.
Biden described the attack as "despicable" and denounced
a corrosive political
climate for contributing to violence.
“It’s one thing to condemn the violence. But you can’t condemn the
violence unless you condemn those people who are arguing that the election is
not real,” adding that the attack appeared to be “intended for Nancy.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8yD_6DG24g
Barack Obama seemed to suggest that the attack was politically
motivated. He claimed that the “habit that we see ... of saying the worst about
other people, demonizing people” had created “a dangerous climate."
https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1586481557136605186
There were many other Democrats who weighed in among them was
failed Presidential Candidate Hillary Clinton.
She blamed the Republican Party and its 'mouthpieces' for
regularly spreading hate and deranged conspiracy theories, adding that the
attack was shocking but not surprising.
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/1586411168880807936
Clinton shared a Los Angeles Times article about the suspect, David
DePape, 42, which claimed that the assailant spread QAnon and other far-right
conspiracies. Most mainstream websites also claimed that DePape was a
‘far-right extremist’.
There were others who say DePape was driven to violence due to
drug-induced paranoid psychosis.
https://twitter.com/ShellenbergerMD/status/1586372835844333568
He is most likely a mentally unstable individual, this is
documented here in a detailed
piece by Andrea Widberg.
Elon Musk, fresh off his acquisition of Twitter, responded to
Hillary’s tweet with a caption “There is a tiny possibility there might be more
to this story than meets the eye,"
Musk linked to a site with the headline, "The Awful Truth:
Paul Pelosi Was Drunk Again”
The
article claimed Paul Pelosi was drunk and met his
alleged attacker who is a male prostitute at a gay bar. The article claimed
that Paul was attacked when something went wrong between the two, the
implication being that the liaison went overboard.
The media was quick to pounce on Musk, they are resentful that he
took over Twitter, and this was their chance to attack him.
MSN claimed that 'Musk
tweets anti-LGBTQ conspiracy theories about the Paul
Pelosi attack'. Yahoo
News, NBC News, Forbes, the NYT, and The Daily
Beast called it a conspiracy
theory. The
Independent called it a lurid conspiracy
theory.
Musk mocked the reaction to the media
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1586871691686223872?s=20&t=SwWP_o41XRHdNrhOMJKAnQ
Musk has since deleted
the Tweet.
So what do we have here?
We do not know what exactly happened that night at the Pelosi
residence. The information available is based on claims of unnamed sources. Unnamed
sources are used usually when the media wants to fabricate.
Yet, the Democrats engaged in a dangerous conspiracy theory without
any proof blaming the GOP for the attack on Paul. They are hoping to scare
voters prior to the mid-terms and secure votes.
The article that Musk tweeted about, also makes insinuations and
claims without proof, but it asks some valid questions.
It is unlikely that someone as astute as Musk isn’t aware of this.
The PR wing for the Democrats which masqueraded as the mainstream
media obviously pounced upon Musk while the Democrat's conspiracy theories were
treated as god’s truth.
The fact that Musk deleted
his Tweet, proves he didn’t entirely believe in the claim about Paul, but
he was engaging in an exercise that had a purpose.
Musk was revealing the absurdity in the Democrat's claim by
engaging in absurdity himself.
He was almost saying “If you can go crazy, so can I, see how it sounds”
But there is a difference between Musk and the Democrats.
That difference is that the Democrats have power and access to
government agencies.
If history has taught us anything, conspiracy theories that
Democrats float are usually weaponized and used against political opponents
A special counsel was appointed after the Democrats floated and
amplified the Trump-Russia collusion conspiracy theory. Trump was
impeached twice based on conspiracy theories. The January 6th committee was
founded on the basis of a conspiracy theory of the 'insurrection'.
The Democrats know that they are likely to lose during the
mid-terms. They will do all they can to either cling to power or place impediments before the GOP after they retake the House and the Senate.
The question is not if but when and how their latest conspiracy
theory will be used against their political opponents.
Musk himself may also be a target.
We may know in the next few days or perhaps in months after the
elections.
Also appears on American Thinker
Comments
Post a Comment