Media propagandists become more brazen as the mid-terms approach


Just yesterday NBC News broadcasted a report by Miguel Almaguer about the attack on Paul Pelosi

In the report,  Almaguer, says the following:

“The 82-year-old did not immediately declare an emergency or tried to leave his home, but instead began walking several feet back into the foyer toward the assailant and away from police. It’s unclear if the 82-year-old was already injured or what his mental state was, say sources.”

“Why Pelosi didn’t try to flee or tell responding officers he was in distress is unclear.”

https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1588533925848104960

Within hours the report was taken down with an editor’s note claiming that “This piece has been removed from publication because it did not meet NBC News reporting standards”

The tweets about the report were also deleted

https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1588585442005618692

So what did happen?

According to a federal affidavitDavid DePape broke into Pelosi’s San Francisco residence on October 28th claiming he wanted to speak with Nancy Pelosi, and eventually attacked her husband with a hammer.

In a San Francisco Court filing, Prosecutors claim that after police reached the residence, Pelosi walked with the attacker to the first floor of his house and opened the door for them.

The two struggled over the hammer in front of the officers at the doorway before the suspect bludgeoned him, the filing said.

"One officer ordered, 'Drop the hammer!'" the filing said.

"But Mr. Pelosi could not maintain his grip on the hammer. A second later, Defendant wrenched the hammer away from Mr. Pelosi, immediately stepped back, and lunged at Mr. Pelosi, striking Mr. Pelosi in the head at full force with the hammer, which knocked Mr. Pelosi unconscious."

The filing added that Pelosi passed out briefly and started to bleed from his head before medical help arrived.

But that didn't happen.

What do we know of the attacker?

DePape is from Canada and was in the United States illegally. He could be deported if found guilty. Illegal immigrants only face deportation when they attack top Democrat leaders, if they attack regular citizens, Democrat-appointed judges just let them go.

DePape was known locally in Berkeley as a pro-nudity activist. a drug consumer and for having a violent temper. He was probably a BLM supporter.

DePape faces state charges including attempted murder, burglary, and elder abuse. Federal prosecutors charged DePape with attempted kidnapping and assault with intent to retaliate against a federal official by threatening or injuring a family member.

DePape has pleaded not guilty

Drew Hammill, Pelosi's spokesperson said that Paul was taken to a hospital where underwent “successful surgery to repair a skull fracture and serious injuries to his right arm and hands."

There were open questions about the attack?

U.S. Capitol Police said that the Speaker and her protective detail were in Washington, D.C. when the incident occurred.

This contradicts the claim that the Pelosi residence always has some security and police presence, irrespective of who is indoors.

https://twitter.com/pnjaban/status/1586031119647928320

The other obvious question is why would a violent attacker accompany Pelosi to the front door where the police were knocking?

The claim made was that Paul had surgery to repair a skull fracture and other serious injuries. Yet he was released from the hospital six days after being attacked? The recovery seems miraculous, especially for an 82-year-old.

Some of these doubts and questions could be answered if the police release their body cam footage or footage of security cameras at the Pelosi residence.

Despite the police saying the motive behind the attack remains unclear, the Democrats and the media rushed to baselessly blame President Donald Trump and MAGA Republicans.

Biden denounced a corrosive political climate for contributing to violence and baselessly claimed the attack appeared to be “intended for Nancy.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8yD_6DG24g

Obama also suggested that the attack was politically motivated.

https://twitter.com/greg_price11/status/1586437393909006338

Failed Presidential Candidate Hillary Clinton blamed the Republicans and its mouthpieces for spreading hate and conspiracy theories.

https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/1586411168880807936

Various Democrat mouthpieces such as The Washington PostThe New York Times, Vanity FairVox, and Rolling Stone, joined and blamed the GOP.

Miguel Almaguer’s report on NBC News could have disturbed the narrative, hence was summarily removed.

This has been done before when the Democrat narrative is challenged.

A report from CBS News revealed that of the billions in aid that the U.S. dispatches to Ukraine, only 30% of it reaches its intended target.

Once again this was a violation of the Democrat narrative of the US helping Ukrainians in need.

Hence, CBS deleted its report and tweets linked to the report.

So what does one make of these retractions?

Does the mainstream media have a Democrat bias?  

Alleging bias assumes that the mainstream media and the Democrats separate entities and the Democrats are influencing the media.

But this is not true.

For ages, the mainstream media has functioned as a propaganda wing of the Democrats. Despite not being officially employed by the DNC, the media is like a department within the Democrat party organization.

There is perfect synchronicity between their utterances. 

They even use identical terminology while covering any given occurrence.

Words such as ‘collusion’ or ‘insurrection’, didn’t catch on miraculously.

An adept Democrat wordsmith supplied these terms and the media  propagandists assiduously repeated them till they became de facto terminology.

This is an echo chamber where only synchronous chimes are permitted. Doubts, deviations, or questions are forbidden, especially now when the media is campaigning for the Democrats.

These propagandists no longer even care to even pretend to be objective or fair.

This is how they covered Joe Biden’s speech a few days back that where he implied that a vote against Democrats is a vote against Democracy in the US. This was a ludicrous claim and should have been ridiculed by any fair-minded journalist.

But instead, the claim received complete endorsements.

This occurred on CBS News

https://twitter.com/CurtisHouck/status/1587936868573843457

https://twitter.com/CurtisHouck/status/1587937795334610944

This happened on ABC News

https://twitter.com/CurtisHouck/status/1587938640210141184

https://twitter.com/CurtisHouck/status/1587939002413293568

This occurred MSNBC

https://twitter.com/MSNBC/status/1588637303869788160

On CNN, Bernie Sanders compared Trump to Hitler and Anderson Cooper just allowed it.

https://twitter.com/CNN/status/1587982010513068035

NBC News, surprisingly, showed some semblance of independence

https://twitter.com/CurtisHouck/status/1587946905199411200

https://twitter.com/CurtisHouck/status/1587947749957320705

But that was a rare display, NBC News usually parrots Democrat talking points.

https://twitter.com/NickFondacaro/status/1588674032110559233

https://twitter.com/NickFondacaro/status/1588675286773760001

https://twitter.com/FreeBeacon/status/1587818985894051841

If the campaign seems coordinated and vicious, wait till the GOP retakes the House and the Senate.

The dehumanization and demonization of the GOP have already begun.

Recall how they reacted when Donald Trump won the presidency in 2016 and multiply it myriad times.

When there is no scandal, these propagandists merely invent one that could give them grounds to deny the results.

They will work closely with the Biden administration and politized agencies. They may manage to initiate probes and investigations similar to the January 6th probe or the Trump-Russia probe.

The media will assume the role of political opposition and become compulsive contrarians at every stage.

The question remains is the GOP, tough, resolute, principled, and resourceful enough to on these nefarious forces

Will they be reactive or proactive or will they capitulate?

Will they be doers or spectators?

We shall know in January 2023.

Also appears on American Thinker

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments