Bari Weiss errs in ‘Twitter Files – 5’ regarding her claims about Indian PM Modi


The fifth installment of ‘Twitter Files‘ by Bari Weiss revealed a culture of intolerance disguised as concern for public safety and propriety at Twitter that eventually led to the de-platforming of President Donald Trump. 

The details were covered in Andrea Widburg’s excellent article.

However, in citing examples of global ‘tyrants’ that still remain on Twitter, Weiss erred in her claim about Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

https://twitter.com/bariweiss/status/1602372171845599232

The basis of the claim was an article in the NYT, from last February which falsely claimed that Twitter was compelled to permanently block numerous accounts for making ‘inflammatory remarks’ about PM Modi after the Indian government issued a notice of noncompliance that could send Twitter’s Indian employees up to seven years in jail.

So let’s revisit the facts.

It started with the Indian government passing three new farm laws that proposed much-required reforms to the Indian farming sector.

However, the passage of these laws did causes concern among farmers, who prefer the old system.

The left and myriad other nefarious forces leaped in and inflamed the situation by spreading misinformation. 

Finally, the farmers began a protest by blockading a highway that led to India’s capital, Delhi. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KG8_Dw6eDDg

In parallel representatives of the protesting farmers were negotiating with the government.

There were rumors that Soros was funding the troublemakers

Juvenile ‘Activist’ Greta Thunberg supported the protests. Thunberg accidentally tweeted a toolkit that revealed a campaign to spread chaos and instability across India using the protests. Also supporting the protest were Meena Harris, niece of US vice-president Kamala Harris, Rep Ilhan Omar, Rihanna, Susan Sarandon, Trevor Noah, John Cusack, etc.

Some protesters resorted to violence, resulting in clashes with the police. These incidences were intermittent.

The chaos reached its peak on January 26th, 2021, which is celebrated as Republic Day in India, it was the day in 1950 that the Indian constitution was ratified. 

To celebrate Republic Day the Indian flag is hoisted at the Red Fort, one of the foremost Indian moments in the capital of India, Delhi. There is also a parade of the armed forces and a cultural pageant to display the diverse cultures across India.

Various violent 'protestors' organized a ‘tractor protest’. The protestor broke barriers despite tight security and broke into the Red Fort and hoisted two foreign flags at the top. This was a desecration of the monument and a symbolic attack on the Indian state. There were also reports of violence in Delhi on the day, causing injury to the police and citizens

A significant number of Twitter accounts and hashtags were used to spread misinformation. Some accounts claimed a protestor was shot dead by the police, despite his death being accidental. Liberal elements in Indian media picked up this claim and amplified it.

On January 30th, 2021, a hashtag emerged that accused the Indian government of planning a genocide of the farmers.

This was a preposterous but grave claim that could have inflamed an already tense situation. The Government of India (GoI) immediately dispatched a notice to Twitter urging them to block accounts and remove tweets that pushed this spurious claim. 

The GoI reminded Twitter that their requests were according to Indian laws under Section 69A of the Information Technology Act that Twitter is obligated to follow.

On February 10, 2021, Twitter blocked a few of the accounts requested but eventually restored many of these accounts.  

On February 11, the GoI served another notice to Twitter reminding employees that non-compliance with Section 69A of the IT Act could result in imprisonment of up to seven years and fines.

Twitter claimed that these GoI orders were not inconsistent with Indian laws and refused to take down the trouble-making accounts.

During a meeting with Twitter executives, the Indian government made it clear that the use of the inflammatory hashtag did not fall under journalistic freedom or free speech, since it was an emergency situation.

This was followed by a prolonged back-and-forth between Twitter and the GoI. Finally, on June 27, 2022, almost six months later the GoI first notice, Twitter blocked the requested accounts per the notices sent by the GoI.

A week later Twitter approached a State High Court challenging the GoI’s orders. The matter is still being debated in court.

Last November, Prime Minister Narendra Modi accepted the demands of the protesting farmer and repealed the three farm laws. He conceded his inability to convince a section of farmers despite his best efforts.

Back to Bari Weiss.

Clearly, both of her claims about Prime Minister Modi are false.

The GoI did not threaten to arrest Twitter employees in India and to incarcerate them for up to seven years for being critical of Modi.

But instead sent a series of notices to Twitter urging them to block accounts that were spreading a false claim that PM Modi was planning a genocide of the protesting farmers. 

Weiss’s claim ignores the fact that there were a series of exchanges between Twitter and the GoI where Twitter refused to follow the Indian laws, despite the grave situation at the protest sites.

There were no ‘threats of arrest’ instead the GoI reminded Twitter India of the results of violating the specific law. Anyone in violation of the law in question would face similar consequences. 

Weiss made it appear that the threats of arrest were vindictive, random, and baseless.

Her sweeping question on why PM Modi was not de-platformed was also baseless PM Modi was not directly involved in any of the exchanges with Twitter and neither has he ever tweeted anything that could be regarded as incitement of violence.

Weiss’s implicit comparison of Modi with Ayatollah Ali Khamenei,  former Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Mohamad, Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed, and President of Nigeria Muhammadu Buhari all of whom openly called for violence against a group of people is gravely unfair.

https://twitter.com/bariweiss/status/1602370518585221120

https://twitter.com/bariweiss/status/1602370784332156928

https://twitter.com/bariweiss/status/1602371899723431937

https://twitter.com/bariweiss/status/1602371607975972864

Hopefully, she will issue an apology and a retraction. 

Perhaps Musk himself will intervene if she fails.

In the end, Weiss’s Tweet thread exposing the internal corruption in the former Twitter regime is of monumental importance. It is hence quite essential that she gets every detail in her right.

Using a debunked NYT article to build a narrative against the corruption of the former Twitter regime is unnecessary because there is plenty of factual evidence to support that claim.

Weiss's claim is also defamatory.

Most people who are unaware of the facts will glance at the Tweet and presume that India is a totalitarian state where no criticism of the PM is permitted. When the truth is India's Twitter is replete with Tweets mocking, attacking, and ridiculing the PM. The fact that the farm laws were repealed is evidence that the government listens to protestors.

It is also counterproductive because Prime Minister Modi was as much a victim of NYT misinformation as President Trump.


Also appears on American Thinker

 

Comments