A
few days back the Washington Examiner carried
a two-part report on how
self-proclaimed 'disinformation' tracking organizations that are targeting
conservative media.
This
is how it works.
Corporate
houses hire digital ad companies to run
their online advertisement campaign.
These ad firms contract "disinformation" trackers for guidance.
The "disinformation"
trackers designate any news website that violates the Democrat groupthink
as 'disinformation' spreaders and bigots. The next step is to blacklist these
websites.
Corporate
houses are 'advised' to not advertise with blacklisted websites.
Corporate
houses realize the peril of defiance. They fear being accused of funding
bigotry, domestic terrorism, anti-scientific ideas, and disinformation,
hence they comply with the orders.
Consequently,
the blacklisted sites i.e. sites that hold the Democrats accountable and
challenge their narratives lose a valuable stream of funding.
In
exchange, these ‘disinformation’ trackers are rewarded handsomely by
Democrat-infiltrated government agencies. The tracker's firms even share
personnel with government agencies.
This
long-term Democrat project aimed at a one-party system where the Democrats
permanently remain in power.
Rigging
the elections by misusing
government powers, promoting mail-in ballots, and prolonging the vote
count, malfunctioning vote-counting machines are part of this project.
Allowing
the influx of illegal aliens and giving them voting rights to underwhelm the
impact of legacy GOP voters is also part of it.
Peddling
hoaxes about the GOP via the mainstream media that functions as the PR Wing for
the Democrats are part of this.
This
has been successfully implemented in New York and California, which results in
the election of the likes of AOC and Gavin Newsome.
In
addition to conquering D.C., liberals have also captured show business, the
publishing business, academia, and most inter-governmental originations such as
the UN and NATO.
At
educational institutions, the young are brainwashed to think that violators of
any of the liberal tenets are immoral.
Showbiz
makes anyone who isn't liberal appear ‘uncool’.
Being
liberal is a lucrative business.
An
activist or an advocate for climate change or any of the other liberal causes
has copious opportunities to thrive without much strife.
This
liberal ecosystem wasn’t built in a day.
This
is the result of focused but gradual but simultaneous creep not only in
politics, but the entertainment business, academia, activism, etc.
The
left only began to demonstrate their true colors during the anti-Vietnam war
protests and the Watergate scandal that forced Nixon to resign where they felt
they had an upper hand.
While
this war on normalcy was being waged, conservatives did what they always
did. They focused on their lives, taking care of their families, earning a
living, and minding their own businesses.
The
left on the other hand is intolerant and designates immorality to anyone that
disagrees with them. The left follows a groupthink and organizes on that basis.
There
is no groupthink among conservatives each has their own ideas about life and
every opinion is
Today
a point has been reached where the left is attempting to outlaw political
opposition and shut down contrarians' views.
If
challengers and dissenters are branded as disinformation peddlers and defunded,
they have a total monopoly on the narrative.
The
left also has government agencies and the media under their thumbs i.e. they
have eliminated all challengers.
The
GOP winning an occasional election is not going to bring about much change.
The
effort has to be sustained.
It
is time for conservatives to rise up, not mimic but build an eco-system to
counter the left.
Perhaps
building a strong news media is a start.
The
recent attempt by the government to stifle and eventually silence conservative
media is a reminder of that.
It
is important that everyone does their bit to support conservative media.
We
begin with the citizen.
The
first step is supporting these media outlets financially. It doesn’t have to be
an astronomical amount. A single-digit donation or the occasional subscription
payment is perfectly alright. Perhaps a beverage or a milkshake is skipped
during a meal or popcorn is avoided during a movie. This amount saved could be
donated to conservative news outlets.
These
donations do not have to even be to the same organization. But the point goal
is to pay to ensure that these outlets are financially independent. This is
protection from nefarious powers that are looking for ways to shut them down.
It
is also important that news emanating from these media outlets is vastly shared
on social media, which increases traffic which is always good.
Now
about GOP politicians.
Perhaps
every GOP leader who receives donations for their campaign finds legal ways to
donate to these news organizations.
Perhaps
GOP members in D.C. challenge the Democrats for funding liberal news
organizations or 'disinfo' trackers.
Perhaps
GOP leaders interact primarily with conservative media.
Instead
of appearing on any of the mainstream media shows, they could video interviews
with conservative media.
Perhaps
President Trump will stop giving access to snakes such as Maggie Haberman
and Bob Woodward and instead give interviews to American Thinker or the Daily
Caller or Breitbart, or Townhall.
Perhaps
after becoming President in 2025, Trump continues to give interviews to
conservative media only. Yes, the mainstream media and the democrats will call
these media outlets ‘far-right’ or ‘alt-right’, perhaps harsher and more
pejorative epithets. But the general public may visit these sites out of
curiosity and this is how the movement grows.
This
ecosystem must not and will never be an echo chamber because conservatism never
follows groupthink.
Let's
take the GOP, as an example to comprehend the lack of groupthink.
The MAGA wing challenges the D.C. establishment and supports the free market, freedom, and liberty. The Ann Coulter wing is disgruntled with the MAGA wing and thinks it has given up on its principles. The GOP establishment wants to destroy the MAGA wing, and so does the D.C. Establishment. The Coulter wing despises the D.C. Establishment. But the D.C. Establishment doesn’t despise the Coulter wing because they don't know it exists. The libertarian wing leans toward the MAGA wing but is not in full support of all its agenda.
This
is real diversity i.e. the diversity of opinion and must continue.
It
has to be remembered despite the noise they create the left is in a minority,
Most
people do not want their high taxes or government interference or mandates or
lockdowns or overregulation or emergencies or their young children to be
exposed to drag shows, etc.
Most
people want fair media that exposes them to facts.
Most
people want their government to stay out of their lives.
The
reason the left has an eco-system is to silence their opposition. They know
their ideas are so deficient that no fair-minded individual will approve of
them, the only way to prevail is to shut down their opposition.
Currently, conservative media which is under constant threat may currently seem like a
flickering flame that is about to extinguish.
But
with a little support, this flame can be protected and could end up illuminating minds.
The choice is yours
Also appears on American Thinker
Comments
Post a Comment