A
week ago President Donald Trump’s debut single topped the iTunes chart.
President
Trump’s duet with the J6 Prison Choir called “Justice for All” features Trump
reciting the Pledge of Allegiance while the background singers comprising of
those unfairly jailed for their involvement in the Capitol protests
on January 6, 2021, sing the “Star-Spangled Banner.”
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/110005961203580004
The
song that toppled Miley Cyrus’s “Flowers” from the top spot sold over 22,000 digital downloads from its release on
March 3 through Monday, March 13.
The “video”
for the track was released on the social media platform Rumble featuring images of the Jefferson Memorial
and the Washington Memorial before switching to Trump speaking to crowds with
US flags flowing.
The
track topping the charts is a strong political statement in favor President
Trump. It is vitally important because the net proceeds from the track go
to January 6th families in need.
Clearly,
this chart-topping track displeased some at Apple who run iTunes.
A day
ago, Apple “temporarily removed” the single from iTunes.
Kash
Patel who served as a national security official in the Trump administration
played an important role in producing the track.
Patel
told Breitbart that the excuse cited
by a senior Apple Music representative for the song’s removal was
“miscommunication between our communications department and our music
operations team,”
By
Thursday evening, the song was back on iTunes but it didn't reclaim its
top spot on the charts.
Fans
of President Trump will be pleased to learn that the current chart-topper on
iTunes chart is “Trump Won” by Natasha Owens.
Time
will tell if any action is taken against Owen’s track
Apple
claimed an intern could have been responsible for the song’s removal.
This
claim is hard to believe that a sole intern would possess the technical
abilities, the authorization, and the access to take such a major step.
Obviously, the goal behind the removal of the track was political spite.
So
what does one make of all this?
Over
the decades the left infiltrated the showbiz ecosystem to the extent that they
have a monopoly.
Back
in 2019, when President Trump held a fundraiser at Beverly Hills, Will,
and Grace ‘star’ Eric
McCormack called for Trump donors in Hollywood to be outed implying
that they deserve to be boycotted for supporting the 'wrong' political leader.
https://twitter.com/EricMcCormack/status/1167309987393110016?s=20
McCormack
happened to say the quiet part aloud which reveals why Hollywood has
become a complete echo chamber.
It is
impossible that such a vast group has a total consensus on ideological,
political, and social issues. Clearly, there are some true believers while
the rest join in like a flock of sheep, bleating in harmony with the chimes of
the echo chamber to prove their loyalty.
This
explains why the debutants, go out of their way to attack President Trump or
express support for BLM or Zelenskyy or Climate Change or LGBT+ issues. They
know it will give them the right kind of attention and ensure lucrative
employment.
It
not just showbiz, The
Twitter Files revealed how big tech willingly works with the Democrats not
to reflect but to manipulate the narrative in their favor.
The
mainstream media functions as a PR wing for the Democrats.
The
removal of the single is a reminder of the vast ecosystem that President Trump
is up against.
Perhaps
they received complaints from artists who were toppled. Perhaps it was big tech.
Perhaps it was sanctimonious others were indignant that a track supporting the ‘insurrection’
had topped the charts.
The
eco-system begins in D.C. and spreads across the news media, showbiz, academia,
corporate houses, big tech etc. Some are true believers while others join in
out of fear
This
is the eco-system that propagated various falsehoods about President Trump from
all forums available.
They
pushed the Trump-Russia collusion hoax to the "insurrection" hoax.
The goal was to delegitimize and demonize President Trump and drive a wedge
between Trump and his supporter. They probably succeeded to some extent.
This
is the same eco-system purportedly plans to indict
President Trump next week following an investigation by the Manhattan
District Attorney’s Office surrounding Trump's alleged hush money scandal
involving porn star Stormy Daniels.
The
claim that Democrats always make is that Trump is different – they will cite
his demeanor or his colorful personal life before joining politics or claim he
is a bigot or an ignoramus to make the case that he deserves to be treated
harshly.
There
is only reliable way to judge President Trump is to evaluate at the impact of
his personal net worth after joining politics.
Everyone
from Obama to Clinton to Biden became multimillionaires upon joining politics.
Trump is among the politicians in the world whose net worth plummeted upon
joining politics. He didn’t even accept a salary as
president.
Another
claim made by the member of the eco-system is that they treat the Bushes, the
Cheney, and the McCains, hence they are not against Republicans in general but
that Trump is such a reprobate that he merits the viciousness he receives..
One
only has to look the positions of these Republicans who receive favorable
treatment in D.C.
There
may be minor disagreements on social issues with the Democrats. However, on the
issues that matter such as big government, open borders, amnesty to illegal
aliens, crony capitalism, and gratuitous foreign wars to enrich the
military-industrial complex, they stand with the Democrats.
In
fact, this relentless targeting is proof that Trump stands against the corrupt,
nepotistic, self-preserving, self-promoting, and nefarious ecosystem that causes
them to fear him.
This
explains their unhinged reactions that range from the petty such as removing
Trump’s song from iTunes to the dangerous such as the potential indictment of
Trump for infractions where others receive no backlash whatsoever.
Trump
would have been living a comfortable life had he not joined politics.
What
about those who say this gives reason to opt for a candidate that stands for
Trumpisms but isn’t an easy target
They
must understand that Trump is a target because of what he stands for, so
are the January 6th protestors and so is each and every
individual who doesn’t subscribe to Democrat groupthink.
If
the GOP nominates someone else who actually stands for what Trump stands for,
they will fabricate claims, and the cycle will repeat. If this individual
receives favorable treatment, you can be sure that there is something very
fishy.
Targeting
individuals for their political beliefs is a regular occurrence in third-world
totalitarian regimes. It has no place as one of the world’s largest democracies.
It is
time for the citizen to rise up against this growing tyranny.
In perilous
times, there is no greater folly than inaction.
Comments
Post a Comment