Ray Epps Is Now Targeting Tucker Carlson



During his expose regarding the occurrences on January 6th, 2021, Tucker Carlson covered the curious circumstances surrounding Ray Epp.

Epps was seen on camera inciting Trump supporters to go into the Capitol the night before the Jan. 6 protests.

https://twitter.com/DarrenJBeattie/status/1534967914423537676

Carlson reported Epp sent a text to his nephew claiming he ‘orchestrated it’.

This is most certainly a suspicious claim to make at that juncture when temperatures were running very high.

Carlson also revealed that when Epps was interviewed by the January 6th House Select Committee, where he claimed that was to be proceeding back to his hotel in D.C. when he sent the text.

Carlson then showed footage of Epps at the Capitol for at least half an hour after his text.

Carlson noted, lying to congressional investigators is a crime, yet Epps was given a pass.

The fact that the January 6th  Committee chose to interview Ray Epps is also very curious. The Committee interviewed only anti-Trump voices and during their show trial allowed testimony of anti-Trump voices, Trump's lawyers weren't given the democratic right to question witnesses.

Why would the committee interview Epps who they claim be a Trump supporter?

Carlson asked basic journalistic questions about Epps’s motives and activities on January 6th, 2021, and made some factual assertions.

Carlson noted that, unlike many others, Epps wasn’t charged or subjected to solitary confinement and other serious punishments.

That is not the only singular aspect of Epp’s case.

Last year during a Senate Judiciary Committee, FBI's national security branch, Jill Sanborn simply refused to answer a question from Senator Ted Cruz if Epps was an FBI agent.

If Epp wasn’t an FBI agent, Sanborn would have vehemently, emphatically, and unequivocally made a statement to that effect.

She would also have excoriated Cruz for implying that the FBI was somehow involved in the ‘armed and dangerous insurrection’ on January 6th, 2021.

But instead, she dodged the question completely.

This is the standard maneuver applied by witnesses attempting to conceal facts while under oath. If one blatantly lies it amounts to perjury, which federal law classifies as a felony and it could cause a prison sentence of up to five years. 

Hence Sanborn merely dodged the question.

This dodge in a response to such grave allegations could be seen as proof of guilt.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZQRetozhSY

So what is Ray Epp up to now?

The NBC News reports Epp’s lawyer Michael Teter sent a letter to Tucker Carlson and Fox News general counsel Bernard Gugar demanding a retraction and apology from Carlson

In the letter, Michael Teter, a lawyer for Epps, said the Fox News host “persists with his assault on the truth” by pushing “fanciful notions” regarding Epps’ involvement in the Capitol attack that has “demonstrably false.”

Teter demanded that Carlson and Fox News publicly retract the claim that Epps was working for the federal government during the events of Jan. 6, 2021, and the claim that Epps “acted as an instigator or provocateur of the insurrection.”

“We expect that you will give the same airtime in retracting these falsehoods as you spent amplifying them,”

“Further, Mr. Carlson and Fox News must issue a formal on-air apology for the lies you have spread about Mr. Epps.”

Teter claimed Carlson’s coverage caused  Epps and his wife to be the victims of  “threats, intimidation, and harassment, resulting in significant economic and emotional damages”

Teter also noted the scrutiny Fox News is being subjected to over Dominion Voting Systems’ $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit against the network.

Dominion sued Fox last March accusing the network of defamation and for boosting conspiracy theories that knew were false, such as Dominion equipment was used to rig the 2020 election for Joe Biden.

Teter wrote. “But fear of losing viewers by telling them the truth is not a defense to defamation and false light.”

None of the mainstream media outlets have reported on the background of Michael Teter.

His Linkedin Page revealed that he is an alumnus of Perkins Coie LLC.

Perkins Coie is the law firm hired by Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the  Democratic National Committee.

Perkins Coie, as part of its representation of the Clinton campaign and the DNC, retained services of the intelligence firm Fusion GPS for opposition research services that began in April 2016 and concluded before the election in early November.”

Fusion GPS hired former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele. Steele authored the dodgy Steele Dossier which was replete with conspiracy theories and hearsay.

The Steele dossier was passed on to politicized government agencies which used it as one of the reasons to spur the Mueller probe.

Last March, the Federal Election Commission fined Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign $8,000 and the Democratic National Committee $105,000 for 'mislabeling' the expense on Perkins Coe as legal services 

Teter is currently an Executive Director for Facts First USA which was founded by disgraced Democrat operative David Brock.

Fact First USA, which is a Democrat outfit claims its mission is to “proactively engage and respond to the MAGA-Majority’s abuse of the congressional oversight process by defending and counterpunching – sometimes surgically, sometimes broadly, but always methodically.”

Who is Brock?

David Brock is the founder of the far-left organization Media Matters.

Brock was an integral part of Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign in 2016.

Brock attacked Bernie Sanders during the primary, implying he was a racist.

Brock gave $200,000 to ‘feminist’ lawyer Lisa Bloom in the final stretch of the 2016 presidential race hoping she could publicize sexual misconduct allegations against Donald Trump. Brock even claimed that 'Trump is the last stand of the angry white man.

Michael Teter is also Managing Director of The 65 Project, another Democrat organization that claims to be a “bi-partisan effort to protect democracy and preserve the rule of law by deterring future attacks on our electoral system.” Whom do they name as the threat to Democrats? President Trump. Brock is part of this enterprise as well.

Cleary Teter stands vehemently against Trump, like most Democrats are, and is a top player in the Democrat party.

Yet he is defending Epps, whom they all insist is a Trump supporter.

It seems obvious that Ray Epps is merely the shoulder that these Democrat operatives are using to rest their rifle that is directed against Tucker Carlson and Fox News.

The Democrats seem to have smelled blood with the Dominion lawsuit and are now ganging up on Fox News.

They hope that if Fox News loses the case and is compelled to pay some of the heavy fines to the likes of Dominion and Epps, it may collapse and a major contrarian voice will be silenced.

AT Link

 

 

 

 

Comments