Did the FBI incite or participate in the chaos of January 6th?


Yesterday at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing titled, "The Domestic Terrorism Threat One Year After January 6," Senator Ted Cruz grilled executive assistant director for the FBI's national security branch, Jill Sanborn, about suspicions that government officials encouraged lawless behavior during the January 6th protest.

Cruz asked, "How many FBI agents or confidential informants actively participated in the events of Jan. 6?"

Sanborn responded that she could not discuss "the specifics of sources and methods" of the FBI.

Cruz then asked if any FBI agents or confidential informants actively participated in the riot.

"Sir, I can’t answer that," replied Sanborn.

Cruz then asked if any agents or confidential informants committed crimes of violence on Jan. 6.

"Sir, I can’t answer that," replied Sanborn.

Cruz asked if any agents or confidential informants "actively encourage or incite" crimes of violence on Jan. 6.

"Sir, I can’t answer that," replied Sanborn.

Cruz then referred to Ray Epps, who was seen on video the day before the riot, telling a crowd, "Tomorrow, we need to get into the Capitol! Into the Capitol!" The crowd responded by shouting, "Fed! Fed! Fed!" at him.

"Miss Sanborn, was Ray Epps a fed?" Cruz asked.

"Sir, I cannot answer that question," Sanborn replied.

Cruz then noted that Epps initially appeared on a poster issued by the FBI seeking information about people connected to criminal activity on Jan. 6, but was absent from another FBI “seeking information” poster distributed July 1.

“Magically, Mr. Epps disappeared from the public posting,” he said.

“According to public records, Mr. Epps has not been charged with anything. No one’s explained why a person videoed​ urging people to go to the Capitol,​ a person whose conduct was so suspect the crowd believed he was a ​'Fed',​ would magically disappear from the list of people the FBI was looking at​.”

"Did federal agents or those in service of federal agents actively encourage violent or criminal conduct on Jan. 6?" Cruz asked, noting that this was "not an ordinary law enforcement question" but "a question of public accountability."

"Not to my knowledge, sir," Sanborn said.



Senator Ted Cruz did well in asking these questions that are in the minds of many Trump supporters for a year. These questions were also raised in Tucker Carlson’s three-part documentary series called "Patriot Purge".

These questions were branded conspiracy theories by the Democrats.

The only way to debunk any theory is to ask questions pertaining to the hypothesis to the appropriate authorities. When these authorities offer precise and unambiguous answers with ironclad proof that disproves these suppositions, the conspiracy theory is debunked forever,

The nature of the questions posed by Cruz was very serious, he was insinuating that the FBI caused the riots of January 6th.

Had the FBI been innocent, Sanborn would have been empowered to categorically and vehemently reject the allegations, plead innocence and express outrage that the questions were asked.

But instead, she dodged the questions.

Sanborn knew she was under oath and if caught lying she be prosecuted for perjury. She also could not throw her colleagues under the bus by stating the facts. Hence she chose the route with the least risk by evading the questions. 

Dodging grave allegations such as these can be regarded as an implicit admission of guilt.

This should come as no surprise, all through the tenure of President Trump, various investigative agencies actively conspired to undermine the President. 

The Trump-Russia investigation was a prime example. In this case, the process was the equivalent of punishment and hung like a sword over the Trump Presidency for over two years. The goal was to prevent President Trump from implementing his agenda. The fact that he managed to get so much done is nothing short of a miracle.

It was also meant to be a warning to any other independent thinker contemplating a run for the Presidency.

This is exactly why President Trump referred to Washington as a swamp.

The swamp doesn’t believe in democracy.

Over the years, the swamp has become so powerful that if they can create their own post-truth narrative which is amplified by the media.

When President Trump was elected, the swamp claimed that the elections were rigged because the Trump campaign colluded with Russia, if anybody claimed that those elections were fair they were branded conspiracy theorists. These claims were made despite a smidgen of proof.

When Biden is ‘won’, the same swamp claimed it is impossible to tamper with an election and if anybody claims the elections were rigged they are conspiracy theorists. These claims were made despite ample proof that the 2020 elections were compromised.  

The swamp that is able to create their own post-truth narratives was obviously not going to allow an election that threatens their supremacy to chance. President Trump was among the few that challenge the swamp and he had to be stopped. 

They used Covid-19 as an excuse to alter the voting method and eventually compromise the electoral process. They used big tech to suppress all anti-Biden stories. In the end, they were successful in removing President Trump from the White House.

The goal now is to prevent President Trump from running for President in 2024. The exchange between Senator Cruz and Sanborn suggests the FBI may have infiltrated the January 6th protest and eventually cause the chaos. The goal once again is to create their post-truth narrative of the January 6th riots which gives them also gives them an excuse to persecute and scare Trump supporters.

His critics often claim that President Trump brought chaos to Washington.

They are wrong, as always.

The sole reason that the swamp was quiet before Trump arrived is that irrespective of if there was a Republican or a Democrat in the White House but the swamp was always in charge. Despite their campaign promises they always followed orders. 

Bush set up Gitmo and Obama continued with it. Bush started wars and Obama continued with them and started a few more. They create an illusion of difference, but in the end, they are all reporting to the same masters.

When the mandate went against them such that their supremacy was challenged, they showed their true colors in causing chaos all over Washington.

In fact, you could argue that chaos in Washington is proof that the country is heading in the right direction. When the swamp has a puppet such as Biden in the White House, Washington remains peaceful, you can be assured that the country is heading towards a catastrophe.

What is good for the swamp is never good for the country.

President Trump’s election hence exposed the Washington swamp.

The only way to drain the swamp is to first elect Republicans back to the Senate and the House in 2022 and then re-elect President Trump in 2024.

The big question is will these elections be fair?


Comments