A day ago, Vice President Kamala Harris sat down for a wide-ranging one-on-one interview with NBC’s Craig Melvin.
Melvin asked Harris about the Biden administration's lack of progress and strategy in
the fight against COVID-19. He inquired
why they haven't updated guidance on masks since public health officials
acknowledge that cloth masks are not as effective as KN95s and N95s.
Harris was also asked about Biden’s divisive rhetoric on the Voting
Rights Bill during his speech in Atlanta and why the administration hasn’t been
able to convince moderate Democrats to vote for their bill.
She was asked about rumors of a potential change to the presidential
ticket in 2024, with Liz Cheney as her replacement.
Firstly, it is nothing short of astounding that NBC news actually did a tough interview with a Democrat leader. The interviewer was unsparing in both the content and the tone of his questions. He asked hard follow-up questions and even displayed skepticism both explicitly and implicitly over Harris’s responses.
There are two possible explanations for the nature of the
interview.
The first is that the catastrophes of the Biden administration
are so monumental that they are impossible to disguise. Even Democrats voters
are suffering and hence NBC had no option but to show some form toughness in
order to retain some form of credibility.
The second is that the Democrat leadership has had
enough of blundering Kamala and is looking for a way to boot her out. The function of the interview is meant to make it clear to public that she is just not up to the job.
How did Kamala perform during the interview?
The only good news is that she didn’t burst into a fit of
titters at an inappropriate moment.
But apart from that Harris was nothing to celebrate.
There was a complete lack of coherence in her
answers. She frequently rambled. There was long pauses before she began her answers. Her staccato speech pattern made her sound like a speech-to-text mobile application.
Beyond her words, facial expressions and her body language lacked poise or confidence which
often happens when an interviewee is ill-prepared. The least you expect from a
leader is to project confidence and optimistic.
She also seemed particularly out of her depths in her response to rumors of a
potential change to presidential ticket in 2024. After a long pause, a hint of
a giggle and a slight stammer she called it DC gossip and punditry and said she
was focused on the job. It wasn’t the content of what she said but her hesitant
delivery that made it sound unconvincing.
If that wasn’t enough, Harris commit a blunder that even
Melvin noted to his co-host on The Today show after the interview was
broadcasted.
Harris claimed that the Biden administration will send out 500 million at-home COVID-19 tests next week. The White House then rectified her claim stating that 500 million at-home tests will be sent out later this month.
This bring us back to the reason why Biden’s handlers chose
Kamala Harris.
Conventional thinking based on appearances is that Kamala is more energetic, and smarter compared to Biden. She is obviously much younger. The fact that she has pigment under her skin is a bonus.
This in the minds of Washington experts, she was the ideal candidate for Vice-President. In their minds it wasn’t a question of if but when Harris would replace Biden.
What also added fuel to these rumors is Biden repeatedly
referring to Kamala as 'President Harris', even during his speech in Atlanta a
few days ago.
While Biden’s handlers who seem to be running the
White House have made a dazzling display of the incompetence on every front.
They were absolutely right in the choice of Kamala Harris.
Someone of great astuteness among Biden’s well-wishers noticed Harris’s
ineptitude and her ability to talk a lot but say nothing.
The Biden well-wisher knew that once Harris was exposed to the people, her ineptness would become obvious immediately.
They hence assigned her the task of managing the Border
knowing she would fail. She probably performed lower their already very low
expectations by first refusing to go to the border and struggling to explain
her reluctance in an interview.
When she did go to Guatemala and Mexico instead of
working with those governments to stop the influx, she meandered about
finding the “root causes” of illegal immigration. Even Peggy
Noonan was baffled by Harris’s quest for what is perfectly obvious
that illegal aliens are seeking a better quality of life in the US.
During her trip to Vietnam following Biden’s disastrous withdrawal
from Afghanistan, she struggled to answer basic questions and
her poorly timed
giggles continued. A BBC correspondent
said that she made America appear like an ‘incompetent, uncaring and
unreliable’ ally.
After that, she was largely missing from the public eye during that time there was were claims that her office environment was unhealthy causing a staff exodus.
One year since Biden has been in office, blundering Kamala is unknowingly
doing exactly what Biden’s well-wishers expected of her. She is making Biden
look unimpeachable.
In fact, Kamala has proved to be so inept on every front that she is even unfit to be a puppet President such as Biden.
Choosing Kamala hence is a brilliant but cynical political
move by Biden’s handlers.
There are those who claim that the contest of ineptitude between
Biden and Harris has given the Democrat Establishment an ideal platform to
implement their unpopular agenda without much accountability.
Irrespective of the motives of the puppet masters, the fact that the
Democrats hold majorities in both the Senate and the House at least till
next January and hold the White House till at least January 2024 means a future full of uncertainty.
This article also appears https://www.americanthinker.com/
Comments
Post a Comment