We
all know that the Democrat party is an enormous echo chamber where only the chimes
of consensus are permitted.
Whenever
anyone dares to sow discord by stating inconvenient
truths, they are walloped with a metaphorical stick and ordered to fall in
line.
We have two recent cases to prove this claim.
First,
the reaction to Fetterman Vs. Oz debate
Anybody
watching the debate knows that Fetterman was cognitively impaired. He clearly
had serious problems comprehending questions and was unable to construct articulate answers. It is perfectly obvious that he is not ready for the job.
This wasn’t
a poor performance it was unmitigated nonperformance.
The
mainstream media initially conceded that Fetterman
was seriously diminished.
MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough said that Fetterman’s “ability to
communicate is seriously impaired. Pennsylvania voters will be talking about
this obvious fact even if many in the media will not.”
Time’s Charlotte Alter, who is
sympathetic towards Fetterman, also conceded that Fetterman fared poorly.
https://twitter.com/CharlotteAlter/status/1585074234250137602?
Democrat mouthpiece The Washington Post called it a “rough night” for Fetterman.
Before we could celebrate the rare occasion of the media being factual, they reverted back to their Democrat talking points
Daily Beast columnist Matt Lewis claimed that the practice of
debates is obsolete.
This is the same Lewis has once called Fetterman and Oz ‘Two
Rich Phonies Playing Populism”
https://twitter.com/mattklewis/status/1585330898387759104
Lewis also claimed Fetterman could earn pity points owing to his condition while Oz looked like a bully.
https://twitter.com/mattklewis/status/1585220726180564992
https://twitter.com/CharlotteAlter/status/1585358763657424896
But MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough really took the cake with his U-turn.
He claimed that Pennsylvanians having a tough
time (he didn't say due to Biden’s weak economy) would relate to Fetterman and cheer
him.
He claimed that debates are not linked to electoral outcomes.
He then baselessly attacked Oz calling him a fraud
https://twitter.com/Morning_Joe/status/1585424103397261314
The rest stuck didn't need U Turns, they stuck to their talking points
MSNBC’s Liz Plank called Oz a bully and claimed ableism won
https://twitter.com/feministabulous/status/1585076267602579456
https://twitter.com/feministabulous/status/1585075680253210624
Co-host of the View Sunny Hostin called Fetterman brave.
https://twitter.com/FreeBeacon/status/1585291239783481344
Now about the infamous letter to Biden.
On Monday when 30 left-wing House
Democrats, led by Rep. Pramila Jayapal (Wa.), chair of the Congressional
Progressive Caucus, sent
a letter to the White House urging Joe Biden to pursue a diplomatic
solution to the war in Ukraine.
The letter was signed by the likes of AOC (N.Y.),
Cori Bush (Mo.), Ro Khanna (Calif.), Ilhan Omar (Minn.), and Jamie Raskin
(Md.)
The idea of peace via diplomacy is the need of
the hour. The U.S. has sent over
$60 billion in aid to Ukraine and he cannot keep doing this forever.
There has been death, destruction, and mayhem for too long, it is time to compel
all parties to come to the negotiation table.
But the war-hungry Democrats standing to
profiteer from this conflict were livid.
Some Democrats demanded that more weapons be sent to Ukraine so that the war can be ‘won;
https://twitter.com/RepRubenGallego/status/1584609672580894720
Others claimed that negotiations will legitimize
Putin.
The same Democrats have no compunctions negotiating
with Iran that is brutalizing its people
https://twitter.com/ChrisMurphyCT/status/1584679936723337216
Rep. Auchincloss (D-Mass.) called the
letter an "olive branch to a war criminal who’s losing his war.”
https://twitter.com/JakeAuch/status/1584727936816803842
Socialists are usually supposed to be anti-war,
however, Sen Bernie Sanders is an exception to that
rule
Rep. Moulton (D-Mass.) called the letter “presumptuous,
out of touch, and would only embolden Putin.”
https://twitter.com/sethmoulton/status/1584936528240734208
The backlash caused the leftwingers to
issue a groveling clarification:
“Diplomacy is an important tool that can save
lives — but it is just one tool. As we also made explicitly clear in our letter and
will continue to make clear, we support President Biden and his
administration’s commitment to
nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine.”
By Tuesday evening the pressure had gotten too much for
the signatories and the letter was withdrawn.
The excuses were implausible.
The senders claimed, “the letter was drafted several
months ago, but unfortunately was released by staff without vetting.” If that
was the case why did they not withdraw it immediately and why did they issue a
clarification to it.
The signatories also claimed that they withdrew the letter since it could be conflated as an endorsement of the GOP's opposition to the conflict.
Why was the letter sent in the first place?
Perhaps the signatories were facing backlash from their voters and were engaging in a charade to distance themselves from both Joe Biden and a deeply unpopular war
It has hard to say what really happened, perhaps
there were threats from the Democrat leadership about withdrawing campaign money
and other luxuries afforded to them by the DC Democrat establishment.
An anonymous Democrat leader revealed the
following:
https://twitter.com/EliClifton/status/1585286455705878528
They didn’t even allow fellow Democrats to engage
in the pretense of urging diplomacy for just a few weeks to win their midterm
contests.
Most are establishment loyalists because it
facilitates pecuniary gains, influence peddling, and power-grabbing.
But the rest are not allowed to breathe freely.
This is because the Democrats are a cult. A cult needs a complete consensus
and even the perceptions of differences of opinion weaken
Contrast this with the GOP
There is one group that opposed the unrestricted funding
of the war. There is another who is a vehement and unconditional supporter of
funding Ukraine for as long as it takes.
Beyond the war, there is a great diversity of perspectives
The MAGA wing stands against the
establishment in support of the free market, freedom, and liberty. There is the Ann
Coulter wing that thinks the MAGA wing has given up on its principles and thinks of
itself as the real MAGA wing. The establishment wing despises the MAGA
wing. The Coulter wing despises the
establishment. The establishment wing doesn’t despise the Coulter wing
because they do not know it exists. The libertarian wing leans toward the MAGA
wing but is not in full support of all its agenda.
These groups openly slug it out in public, however, the GOP establishment has never compelled anyone to withdraw statements or
issue groveling apologies.
The Democrats frequently refer to Trump’s supporters as bigoted, vacuous, and brainwashed cult members who follow the Pipe Piper of Mar-a-Lago where ever he goes.
This seems to be another case of the left blaming
their opponents for the folly that they are guilty of.
George Bernard Shaw famously said, "The
reasonable man adapts himself to the world while the unreasonable one persists
in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the
unreasonable man."
In modern times, the "unreasonable" man
will never be allowed in the Democrat party.
Firstly because they do not approve of gender-specific words and secondly they despise contrarian perspectives. It is amazing
they call themselves progressive. The word has been hijacked and bastardized.
However, the ‘unreasonable’ man despite staunch opposition
was allowed in the GOP and even became President in 2017, despite opposition
within the party at every stage of the race.
The GOP, despite its myriad shortcomings, is the
party of freedom and diversity while the Democrats are a sinister cult.
Comments
Post a Comment